Sunday, August 21, 2011

Rainblockers: Question from a Reader


This question came in from a reader today.  Does anyone have any information?


Not sure where to post this but What ever happened regarding the class acton lawsuit
of the rain blockers in the sewers that caused MAJOR flooding?


The background information below is from the City of Chicago Website  http://www.cityofchicago.org/

Blocking Rainwater and Preventing Sewer Backup
Looking out the window as one flies into O'Hare airport, a sea of rooftops fills the Chicago landscape. And off those rooftops, much rain does run - straight into the city's sewer system.
With an abundance of buildings, streets and parking lots, urban areas have very little green space to absorb or slow down the onslaught of water in a heavy rain. It's especially a problem in the City of Chicago, a city built on a swamp. The high water table contributes to slower absorption rates and more water flowing overland to fill the city's sewers - an interconnected system carrying both storm runoff and sanitary sewer waste.
Chicago's long and colorful history includes troublesome tales of flooded homes filled with five feet of contaminated, bacteria-carrying water from sewer backup. Residents have had to clear muck, throw out possessions and redo their basements - time and time again. It's no wonder that a solution is top priority for these urban citizens.
After the flood of 1997 caused hardship and property loss for some 35,000 residents of its close to three million population, city officials took action. They first asked themselves, 'How do we prevent the system from reaching maximum capacity?' Slowing the heavy inflow of rainwater into the sewer system at the peak of the storm was the answer.
To accomplish this, city officials formulated a two-pronged strategy: install mechanical devices called inlet restrictor valves and promote downspout disconnection by homeowners citywide. Purchase and installation cost $75 million dollars. This was about a quarter of what traditional sewer system improvements would have cost. Near Chicago, the City of Evanston has installed a similar valve system that has helped reduce basement backup.
A $7.8 million grant from the Federal Emergency Management Agency Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) jumpstarted the Chicago project in 1998 by funding a pilot program in three areas of the city that were repetitively hit with basement flooding. John Roberson, Chicago Sewer Department Commissioner, said, "In every subsequent rain that we've had since the pilot program was implemented, the pilot areas have not experienced the type of flooding they normally would have."
Slowing the Flow
Chicago initiated its inlet control valve system (called the "Rainblocker" program) as one facet of a multi-dimension concept.
When the restrictor valve is installed in the storm water catch basin in the street, the device, in essence, shrinks the pipe to funnel and regulate the water from the street to the main sewDWM workers installed close to 200,000 inlet restrictor valves into Chicago's street catch basins, at a rate of 90 to 120 per day. er line. During a heavy rain event, the smaller opening allows less water into the sewer system. The streets act as a temporary holding area for the rainfall. Surplus water in the system will not be forcing contaminated water back through homeowners' private lines and into the home's lowest spot - the basement. The street ponding buys time for the system to catch up.
A Work in Progress
The city is the first to recognize flooding problems still exist. Flooded streets, a problem deemed preferable to flooded basements, are an acknowledged byproduct of the valve system because of the restricted flow of water into the sewers. In the recent rains, some residents reported only a couple of inches of water where in previous storms their basements had held over a foot of water. In some instances, however, homes that had never been flooded before were flooded in this last event due to ponded runoff entering basement windows and doors.

When Mother Nature decides to dump four inches of rain in little over an hour, it's difficult for any man-made system to handle such a rain event. Private lines may be blocked or damaged. Downspouts add millions of gallons of clean water to the sewers. Streets fill up and water flows overland, sometimes causing flooding.
The "Rainblocker" program is clearly a work in progress, but if basement backup has been minimized each time it rains, then it appears the city is headed in the right direction. This system requires combined efforts from city officials and all impacted citizens. In the next phase of resolving bottlenecks in the system, the Chicago Sewer Department is working with City Aldermen to identify over-the-curb flooding of homes and to evaluate areas that continue to experience basement flooding.

10 comments:

  1. The only reference I could find after a quick search: The lawsuit filed in 2006 "Costello v. City of Chicago" by Quinlan & Carrol Ltd, 30 N. LaSalle.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I do recall edgebrook being a pilot community for rainblockers and it was a mess. The rainblocker contract went to a Daley brother friend - the city spent 75 million or so, and there were massive problems. I believe the city removed some of the rainblockers, but not all.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Edgebrook was a pilot community for the rainblockers and the valves were placed all over the city before someone realized you need high curbs to hold the water when the valves shut off during a storm. And if you live here in Edgebrook you know many streets have no curbs at all.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Spend the 7 grand and have Park's plumbing install the storm water blocking system on your sewer line. You will not have any problems after that. Anything else is secoind best.

    From: Someone in the know that knows a thing or two about a thing or two. America.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I live in Edgebrook. As time goes by these valves become clogged with debris and can take up to 48 hours to drain the street after a storm, but that's what they are supposed to do, isn't it?

    ReplyDelete
  6. This problem we are having with flooded basements did not occur 50 years ago because the sewer lines that were installed 50 years ago had sufficient capacity to remove rain water from the downspouts, the accumulated rain water from the surface streets and the sewage generated from homes. 50 years ago the average square footage of a home in the 41st ward was approximately 1300 square feet. Now 50 years later the average square footage of a home in the 41st ward is approximately 1900 square feet. Not only did we have an increase in the square footage of homes, but we had an increase of 20 % more homes that have been built from 50 years ago. That means more plumbing fixtures in each home including Jacuzzi tubs that are triple the capacity of a standard tub, more roof surface area that catches rain water and less green space to absorb the rain water. In addition, we have more paved alleys with sewers feeding into the main sewer system, shopping centers and strip malls that drain into the sewer system. In the past 50 years we have increased the water input into our sewer system by at least 50 % and the city has done nothing to increase the capacity of our sewer system. They have tried cheap fixes like the rain blocker and very expensive fixes like the deep tunnel project, neither of which has come close to solving our problems but just squandered our tax dollars. They have advised homeowners to divert their downspouts causing the homeowner an additional expense to no avail. My basement has flooded 3 times in the past 3 years causing an average of $15,000.00 each time my basement flooded. I did not sign up with the city to provide additional capacity to their sewer system by storing sewer water in my basement and I know that my neighbors did not as well. The city bills us for sewage taken away from our homes every 3 months as a line item on the water bill and again there is no stipulation that homeowners basements will act as a reservoir for the sewer systems lack of capacity. With the construction of new homes, businesses, and additional square footage added to existing residences why have they not increased the sewer capacity? They are aware of all of these changes as a permit is needed each and every time a building is built or remodeled or an alley is added. For too many years they have ignored our needs in the 41st ward and it makes me sick to see my tax dollars squandered in the worst neighborhoods of the city as they ruin the improvements as soon as they are finished. If the city refuses to increase sewer capacity then we as a community need to bring a class action lawsuit against the city, as it seems to be the only thing that gets their attention. I would propose that homeowners would be able deduct their sewer portion of their water bill every three months until they are made whole for the damage done to their homes. In addition, a flood control system would be installed by the homeowner that would prevent sewer backup of city sewage as they refuse to increase capacity of the sewer lines and a flood control system is the only way to prevent the city from using our basements as a reservoir for their inadequate sewer system, also deductible from our sewer bill until made whole for this system. The City of Chicago Landlord Tenant Ordinance allows for tenants to deduct from their rent a reasonable and customary amount for repairs that the landlord refuses to make to the tenants property. I say it’s time for us to start making these deductions as our landlord refuses to make the necessary repairs to our sewer system. WE NEED A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AGAINST THE CITY. ANYONE KNOW OF AN ATTORNEY THAT WOULD TAKE OUR CASE ON. cOMOiNNjOE@GMAIL.COM

    ReplyDelete
  7. City should be paying the 7000 to every homeowner that the city has used their basement for sewage due to the citys lack of the increase in sewer capacity.

    ReplyDelete
  8. If anyone looks up Costello v. City of Chicago or calls Quinlan & Carrol, post a comment and let us know what you find out.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Maybe its time for the city to dig up some sewer lines and REPLACE them or UPDATE the current pipes......amazing that since Ive been able to walk my parents street has always flooded and so has their basement. Their neighbors have experienced such bad flooding that one neighbor has kept his basement empty. Give me a break with all the excuses. The city should be liable for most of this incompetence. Time for the lawsuit. We can understand a horrible rainstorm once in a while, but honestly we put raingutters on houses because we expect rain and prepare for the rain by cleaning out our gutters. The city puts in some "work in progress" in OUR sewers and not THEIR sewers......my question to the OVER PAID part time aldermen is HOW MANY TIMES HAVE YOUR BASEMENTS FLOODED????????

    ReplyDelete
  10. Readers,

    The blog moderator for the popular "Chicago Clout" blog is Patrick McDonaugh, a city plumbing inspector. He has written about the rainblocker program, and some of the issues you have brought up, on his blog. I wrote Mr. McDonaugh asking him to share his professional and institutional knowledge about rainblockers & flooding with us. He has replied, and generously offered to meet with interested people.

    If any of you would be interested in meeting with Mr. McDonaugh, send me your name and email addresses through the comments (won't be published), and I will try to set something up.

    Check out Chicago CLout blog and search the blog for "rainblockers".... interesting.

    ReplyDelete