Thursday, August 25, 2011

School Board Approves Property Tax Hike

Readers:  It's here - a property tax hike.  Send comments.

 CPS board approves tax hike and budget for next year, but challenges remain


August 24, 2011|By Joel Hood and Noreen Ahmed-Ullah,  Tribune reporters

Chicago Public Schools' governing board on Wednesday unanimously approved a tax increase to support a $5.9 billion budget for next year amid growing concerns about the district's long-term financial health and an escalating public battle with the teachers union over longer school days and pay.
Despite $400 million in cuts in 2011-12, a property tax increase that will cost an average homeowner roughly $84 a year, and potentially hundreds of layoffs, the school district remains in financial peril. CPS staff says rising pension and health care costs will contribute to an $860 million budget deficit in 2014, and that's assuming all other expenses remain flat.

Chief Administrative Officer Tim Cawley told the board that solutions are hard to come by, but that they will almost certainly include help from state legislators to lift some of CPS' pension obligations, assist in recovering millions in late payments owed to CPS and establish an entirely new framework to fund public education in Chicago.

"I have to tell you, I'm tired and embarrassed of responding to questions on this, saying, 'I don't know how we're going to close that $860 million gap two years from now,'" Cawley told board members. "We've got to develop a plan and share it with you soon. We've got to talk to the folks in Springfield about structural changes."

Until that blueprint surfaces, Cawley said, CPS is focusing on slashing costs. Over the next several years, this will surely mean more school closings and consolidations, more layoffs and further cuts to the central office bureaucracy, district officials said.
None of that will matter, he warned, without a complete rethinking of the public school model at the state level.

"That $860 million is more than four times the entire central office expense," Cawley said. "So you could close this place down entirely and fire everybody in the building four times over and you'd still have a deficit. So we cannot save our way to success here."
In the short term, district officials are still trying to wrestle with how to implement a longer school day, perhaps beginning in January, without a significant pay raise to teachers. CPS rescinded the 4 percent raises owed teachers in next year's budget to help close a record $712 million budget deficit.

But CPS Chief Executive Jean-Claude Brizard floated a plan late Tuesday that would return a 2 percent pay raise to elementary school teachers in January if they agreed to work an additional 90 minutes each school day and an extra two weeks. The district says the proposal would cost it an extra $15 million, which administrators say they would pay for with further cuts.
Chicago's school days are among the shortest in the country. Brizard and Mayor Rahm Emanuel have fought for longer school days and a longer school year, saying they're critical to improving student performance in a school district that chronically lags behind those in other large cities.
"We're not only looking to benchmark to the rest of the country, we're looking to lead," Brizard said. "Understand that this is a priority for us."

The Chicago Teachers Union, while not outright rejecting the proposal, is unenthusiastic about the idea. Union President Karen Lewis said Wednesday that a 2 percent raise would be very small compensation for a 90-minute-longer school day plus two weeks added to the school year. She said she had fielded calls from teachers upset at the proposal.
"Teachers plan," Lewis said. "We just don't jump into things."
Early this week, CPS negotiators rejected an offer by the union to raise teacher salaries by 2 percent this year and an additional 2 percent next year. Lewis, who was invited to participate in a committee exploring a longer school day, said she declined because the panel did not include other teachers but people she characterized as politically connected.

CPS and the union will
soon begin negotiations on a new four-year teachers contract, trying to reconcile the issues of a longer school day, teacher salaries and performance evaluations.
CPS' new leadership acknowledged at Wednesday's meeting that the budget, while comprehensive, was cobbled together in just three months. But some still criticized the document for errors, including inaccurate enrollment numbers, failing to report total district staff, and unrealistic future projections by assuming pension and health care costs are the only ones that will rise.
"That's not the way to do long-term planning," said Rodney Estvan, education policy analyst with the disability advocacy group Access Living.
Access Living and the independent Civic Federation supported the need to raise property taxes but raised concerns about CPS' overall financial outlook. The district shares those concerns.
"This organization has become bloated, inefficient and overcomplicated," Cawley said.

20 comments:

  1. We pay some of the highest property taxes in the city and our schools are overcrowded and old. If we got somethng for the tax increase, it wouldn't be such a bitter pill to swallow. The north side of chicago needs its own school district... call it District 299(N). We need our own budget and board too. This is just NOT fair.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The 41st Ward communities of Norwood Park, Edison Park, Edgebrook, Oriole Park, etc needs to be officially annexed into Park Ridge and become incorporated with Park Ridge. School systems better, decent police department, libraries and other services. SCREW the city - we get no police protection or education for our kids. Time for us to leave.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Tim Cawley is from the private sector - used to work at Motorola and Ameritech. He may be what is needed to turn this around. I don't think we can count on Jean Clade. Rochester was glad he left.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I thought the alderman had a sit-down with the new CEO Brizard???????? are they going to raise my taxes again?

    ReplyDelete
  5. The Chicago school district is way to big and inefficent. The current Chicago school district #299 could be broken into 2 or three districts (North, West and South Side Districts) with their own elected school boards and individual budgets. My experience with CPS is that there are two many fragmented systems and no one knows what anyone else is doing. Make the school districts smaller and more organized.

    ReplyDelete
  6. teachers turned down a longer school day for a 2% raise. Good for them. CTU better draw the line in the sand with this mayor.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The average homeowner will see a $84.00 increase in their property tax bill says the chicago school board. In the 41st ward, that translates into double that figure because our homes aren't average, so we are looking at an increase of $100.00 or over..

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm a parent not keen on the idea of a longer school day. I believe kids need time outside of school everyday to play, go to scout meetings, dance classes, sports practice. And, as their parent, I help them every night with their homework. Their school day is long enough. I want them to have time to enjoy their childhood.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Chicago kids get free breakfast and lunch. Lets add free supper now. While we are at it - lets keep kids in school 24/7 (parents need to work two or three jobs just to pay property tax increases) and let them see their parents at Christmas. That should raise their test scores.

    ReplyDelete
  10. The mayor is directly correlating the longer school day with better test scores. Better test scores aren't going to happen by locking kids in a building for an extra 90 minutes a day. Better outcomes come from kids receiving the proper kinds of supports at home in addition to what they learn in school.

    ReplyDelete
  11. We can't be annexed by Park Ridge. We'ld have to repay the City of Chicago for the improvements. Too expensive, nice try though.

    ReplyDelete
  12. What improvements? That's the problem! No improvements. We most certainly can be annexed.

    ReplyDelete
  13. What makes you think Park Ridge wants the 41st Ward? I bet they don't. Typical Edison Park wanna be -wishing they were in Park Ridge. Too bad for you!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Adding a full hour and a half to the school day is nuts. Will be traumatic for the kids to have to sit for an hour and a half longer each day and for the teachers who are already stretched to the limit by layoffs, etc.

    Why not an incremental increase in classroom time? Add 30 minutes to the school day each year for the next three years... would also help the CPS budget to incrementally add time to the teachers day, which may be affordable.

    ReplyDelete
  15. My understanding is that 95% of the schools in the 41st ward are academically excellent with great test scores due to the dedicated parents and teachers. Our kids don't need a longer school day. Why are they being forced to sit in school 90 minutes longer?

    ReplyDelete
  16. This is what you get when the select few of one party run every thing: 67% income tax increase; increased property, sales tax and about every fee you can think of; and lets not forget the almost doubling of tolls. Tolls by the way that were going to be eliminated in the original law. You get what you vote for.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Incentives like a shorter school day for good grades and test scores might work. I know I would work my a** off to get out of school earlier.

    ReplyDelete
  18. To 7:48am - this blog is a 41st Ward blog. The 41st ward encompasses many neighborhoods including Edison Park. The 41st ward neighborhoods: O'Hare, Oriole Park, Norwood Park, Edgebrook, Wildwood, Edison Park.

    ReplyDelete
  19. To 4:33 But Edison Park borders Park Ridge. Niles, borders the ward and so does Harwood Heights, and Norridge. So why Park Ridge? Like I said - just a wanna be - too bad! There is nothing in it for Park Ridge to encompass the 41st ward.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Just wait: Rahm E. will get his way, the school day will be lengthened, and the test scores will go down!

    ReplyDelete