Tuesday, October 25, 2011

The State Legislative Veto Session Opens Today. Tax Cuts For the Exchanges, Gambling, ComEd. The State Pension Crisis. When will it be addressed?

The legislative veto session opens this morning.  Like you, I'm holding my breath hoping something contructive gets done.  It is disappointing to see so little movement with pension reform, even with future pensions.  Meanwhile, this afternoon, the Senate looks at a bill to give corporate tax breaks to the Chicago Mercantile and the Board of Trade.

The corruption you see, the doomsday you don't



During their combined 74 years in the Illinois General Assembly, House Speaker Michael Madigan and Senate President John Cullerton have voted for hundreds of billions of dollars in state spending. Trouble is, Illinois doesn't have the money to meet all of Madigan's and Cullerton's commitments. They, along with Gov. Pat Quinn, oversee a government that today has nearly $200 billion in debts as well as future obligations for which there's no money.

Yet every indication suggests that, once again, Madigan and Cullerton will be waving from the curb as this situation grows even more disastrous. We see no evidence that Madigan and Cullerton will use the legislative veto session that opens Tuesday to reduce future pension earnings, while protecting benefits already earned, for current employees.

You'd think Madigan and Cullerton would pull out all stops to pass pension reforms that are more important than any other legislation during the veto session. The Illinois pension system that Madigan and Cullerton have helped construct has elements that embody the very definition of "corrupt" — contaminated, morally unsound, debased, venal. What's more, that pension system is headed for the inevitable doomsday when it runs dry for retirees, and Illinois taxpayers will be asked to make it whole.

This veto session needs to deal with both of those crises: the pension corruption you see, and the pension doomsday that, until the system implodes, you don't. Will Madigan and Cullerton now deliver reforms? Or will the veto session be one more wasted opportunity, with these two men murmuring intentions to do the something … later.

Yes, we're talking here in part — but only in part — about the galling expose that began on the front page of Sunday's Tribune under the maddening headline, "Sub for a day, teacher pension for life":

Two lobbyists with no prior teaching experience were allowed to count their years as union employees toward a state teacher pension once they served a single day of subbing in 2007 … Over the course of their lifetimes, both men stand to receive more than a million dollars each from a state pension fund that has less than half of the assets it needs to cover promises made to tens of thousands of public school teachers. … The revelation that one day of substitute teaching allowed officials from a state teachers union to tap into an ailing public pension fund is yet another example of how the Illinois pension system has been manipulated for political purposes and personal gain.

Political purposes and personal gain. Hmm.

The personal gain is obvious: Steven Preckwinkle, political director for the Illinois Federation of Teachers, and fellow union lobbyist David Piccioli have embarrassed every diligent schoolteacher who employs them but will never qualify for such lavish benefits. We're eager to learn whether Preckwinkle and Piccioli do choose to go through with looting the Teachers' Retirement System by accepting pension payments when they retire.

We're also eager to learn which Springfield school officials, by letting these two lobbyists into classrooms for a day, allowed them to exploit schoolchildren as pawns in their shakedown of the teachers system.

Those political purposes of this secretive stunt? That's where things get interesting. The pension fairy tapped her wand on Preckwinkle and Piccioli via legislation passed shortly after Illinois Democrats had splendid success in the 2006 general election. By their political action and big donations, teachers unions helped Democrats secure the re-election of the governor, Rod Blagojevich, and the election of Democrats to every other statewide office and to many seats in the General Assembly. Far be it from us to suggest that legislative Democrats quietly rewarded union lobbyists by arranging for them someday to be millionaires; many Republicans, too, voted for the bill because of other provisions it contained. But, sure enough, the net effect is that union lobbyists — teachers-for-a-day — wound up eligible to collect lavish benefits from the Teachers' Retirement System.

Mr. Madigan, Mr. Cullerton, every few days the Tribune has been publishing new revelations of scummy pension deals that became legal on your watch in Springfield. Ending the corruption you've tolerated is necessary. But it certainly isn't sufficient.

We were pleased Monday to see a bill initiated by House Republican Leader Tom Cross emerge from committee; the legislation addresses Chicago schemes that have allowed labor leaders to claim public pensions based on their earlier years as city employees. But this isn't a bill that will significantly reduce the state's unfunded pension obligations.

So, Mr. Madigan, Mr. Cullerton, we'll all see how much influence you exert to undo pension corruption — and to reform future benefits so employees someday can collect pensions from a solvent system.

For now this whole pension debacle is all yours, gentlemen. You own it, along with the resulting financial obligations that you and your colleagues have created for furious taxpayers.

You have six session days. Pension reform first.

32 comments:

  1. This must be addressed soon - we could potentially have many state workers without the pension benefits they worked for. If I were a state worker, I would be very concerned. Also, taxpayers aren't going to be able to afford bailing out the pension system with another tax increase. Something needs to be put in place to ease pension liabilites.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I like a "millionaires tax for the State of Illinois (not for the city, as has been suggested in some of the comments). The state of New York has had a millionaires tax in place for years and it generates about 13 to 14 billion dollars/year. And when it was first implemented (I was there, I remember), all the nay sayers said "The wealthy will move". Well, guess what, no one moved. Can you imagine a millionaire saying, "the state wants me to pay an extra thousand dollars, I'm outta here". No, its ridiculous.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sneed is reporting " the Chicago Mercantile and the Chicago Board Options Exchange will be granted an adjustment in their corporate income taxes by the State Senate today".

    Can you BELIEVE this? The Chicago Mercantile makes TWO BILLION dollars/year and we are giving them another tax break?

    I hope Mulroe isn't voting for this!

    ReplyDelete
  4. No way can Mulroe vote to give the Mercantile and Board of Trade corporate tax breaks after voting for a huge tax increase for us, his constituents.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Illinois lawmakers weigh tax breaks, penalties for business
    Measures address financial exchanges, ComEd, Sears requests
    October 24, 2011|By Kathy Bergen, Julie Wernau and Dan Hinkel | Tribune reporters
    Chicago's financial exchanges would see a 50 percent decrease in their Illinois corporate income tax bills under legislation introduced Monday afternoon by Senate President John Cullerton, D-Chicago.

    Illinois would tax a fraction of the income generated by the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, the Chicago Board of Trade and the Chicago Board Options Exchange, all of which have threatened to move operations out of state after Illinois temporarily raised its income tax earlier this year.

    The bill, which would reduce the exchanges' taxes by tens of millions of dollars, attempts to limit levies on income attributed to Illinois-based transactions and would continue to fully tax income derived from open-outcry transactions on trading floors in Chicago. But those transactions represent a small slice of business now, with most activity having migrated to electronic trading.

    Under the proposal, only 27.54 percent of income stemming from electronic trading and clearing fees would be subject to Illinois' corporate income tax, compared with 100 percent now. A spokesman for Cullerton added that the legislation could change in the days ahead.

    ReplyDelete
  6. No wonder there's no money to fund pensions, the corporations don't have to pay their fair share of taxes.

    ReplyDelete
  7. So the politicians lie, cheat steal and drive the state toward bankruptcy and the braniacks' answer is to tax success. Has any one been paying attention to the number of companies threatening to leave Illinois: Caterpiller, Baxter the CME...and quinn just bribed Motorola to stay. Small business gets stuck because they don't have the wack to say exempt us or we're leaving. These are the businesses that create the jobs. So what do they do--they leave. I have a client whose grandfather started the business. Three generation Illinois family business that is building over a 100,000 square foot manufacturing plant. They have narrowed their choice down to three states. Illinois was never under consideration. Why? A steady trend of anti business policy. The latest being the income tax increase and corporate income tax increase which passed our state senate by one vote. (yes Mulroe voted for it) Oh! wasn't that going to solve our budget problems. No of course not! That increase only capped how much state spending could increase. This small family business will follow his largest client and take his 22 jobs with him...not to mention the thousands that will be employed at the plant in good paying jobs with full benefits.

    ReplyDelete
  8. If the vote is close Mulroe will do what he is told.

    ReplyDelete
  9. To 7:53 A.M endorsing the millionaire tax. Governor Cuomo of New York recently said under no circumstances would he consider backing the extension of the surcharge (millionaire tax) saying it would encourage residents and businesses to move to other states. Even a liberal democrat sees the folly of the tax. Why do you think New York has gone from the second largest state in the Union to fourth?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hey 8:54: Did you see the kids protesting in Springfield recently? They were calling out Sears for threatening to leave the Illinois unless they recieved an extension of their 14-year tax break. The kids are tired of the corporate bastards who refuse to contribute their fair share.

    And your claim that our state is "anti-business" is business-speak. You don't want any rule/regulation that treats workers fairly, whether it is Workers' Comp, or the right for workers to bargain collectivly, you want none of it.

    As for your often repeated talking point that small businesses are the "job creators" - that's a joke. It is demand that creates jobs, and decent wages that create demand.

    Any business who holds our citizens hostage for greedy tax breaks should be exiled to Texas. Get lost and and don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.

    ReplyDelete
  11. To 7:53 A.M: The drafters of the Illinois constitution anticipated silly ideas like yours...the millionaire tax. Article IX sec 3 states that the income tax has to be non-graduated. To spell it out for you: It has to be flat--every one taxed at the same rate.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Tired of Corporate greed. 8:45am - your the problem. Becasue you don't want to pay your fair share, it gets passed on to the workers you say you will hire, and it diinishes their wage. And because small businesses and big boxes don't give health insurance to their employees (or the health ins they do offer cant be afforded by the worker), the worker ends up with medicaid, all kids or uninsured which we who do PAY TAXES pay for. So hit the road, corporate leech. You have a great city and state here. Move your company, it isn't doing us a bit of good.

    ReplyDelete
  13. To 9:26 AM: A Liberal at 20 is a patriot... A liberal at 40 is an idiot. Winston Churchill.

    ReplyDelete
  14. 9:14am - apparently you aren't up on your demographics, but the millionare's in New York haven't gone anywhere. Manhattan and Upstate New York remain vibrant and growing. Lower income communities are losing population for a variety of social reasons.

    ReplyDelete
  15. 9:30am

    The Illinois Constitution was written in a time where selfish corporatists didn't exist. We have a small number of powerful wealthy people in this country who don't respect the same social compact our ancestors diesd for.

    Don't worry, all states will have to do something to tax the wealthy soon, as the unemployed will soon outnumber the employed.

    ReplyDelete
  16. 9:53 A.M. Illinois Constitution was adopted on December 15, 1970...not that long ago in the grand scheme of things.

    ReplyDelete
  17. History Lesson (Gather around):

    The first Illinois Constitution was adopted in 1818 when Illinois was admitted to the Union. Succeeding constitutions were ratified in 1848, 1870 and 1970.

    ReplyDelete
  18. To 9:14.

    In New York, the millionaires tax is a tax surcharge, not part of the "flat tax". Look it up. And recent polls show overwhelming taxpayer support to continue the millionaires tax in the State of New York.

    ReplyDelete
  19. To 9:14 A.M: They call it a "surcharge" in New York but it nonetheless would be un-constitutional under the ILLINOIS CONSTITUTION. Many states allow a graduated tax whether they call it a "surcharge" or a "progressive income tax." Illinois does not. You are correct that polls in New York show overwhelming support. Cuomo (a liberal Democrat)is holding firm because he knows it is hurting the state. So lets recap: 1) It can't be done under the Illinois Constitution. 2) Even if it could, it is bad policy. To be fair about Coumo's position. He has said (which I disagree with) that he would favor a federal millionaire tax because then all the states would be on equal footing. Problem with that is we are now living in a time where it is just as easy to move jobs over the boarder or across the oceans as it is to move to another state.

    ReplyDelete
  20. 9:26 to 9:37: Churchill never said a liberal is an idiot. Your deliberate misquote aside; Until his last day Churchill believed in Englands' version of universal health care. He stated that disease is just as much an enemy of a nation as a military foe.

    Patriotic Americans, proud ones like myself, would be happy if you ruthless people would just go along with Winston on this one. Treasonists cheer wildly while screeming 'let em die' when discussing the plight of the uninsured at Republican debates.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I hope Senator Mulroe doesn't vote to give the Mercantile and Board of Trade tax cuts for a few reasons: 1. we really need the revenue 2. I was disguested bythe Merc when they said they were the proud 1% with their window display during the Occupy protests. Arrogance like that needs a strong message. 3. I don't necessarily understand the Occupy protests, but respect the rights of the young people out there. I think passing any more coporate tax cuts right now in the worst of economic times send a terrible message to young people stuck in the middle of this mess.

    ReplyDelete
  22. You are right blogger, not much going on with pensions. A few bills to end corruptive practices and also Rep Cross' bill giving the mayor control of the city workers pension board (4 member appointed by the mayor and 3 elected by city workers). Having any politician in charge of controlling a pension board is a mistake as we saw with the mayor who allowed his nephew to use pension funds to invest in his own investment company, to which he lost the dough.

    I hope McAuliffe is hip to this move and votes no to mayor controlled pension boards. We will see. Lots of cops voted for McAuliffe, so I bet he votes no or abstains.

    ReplyDelete
  23. to the churchill fans: The actual quote is: "If you are not a liberal at 20 you have no heart. If you are not a conservative at 40 you have no brain". If you are going to quote greatness get it correct. Another great churchill quote: " Some regard private enterprise as if it were a predatory tiger to be shot. Others look upon it as a cow that they can milk. Only a handful see it for what it really is--the strong horse that pulls the whole cart." Thanks for the entertaining lunch break. Back to work to help pull the cart.

    ReplyDelete
  24. This blog cracks me up. My favorite Churchill quote:

    You can always count on Americans to do the right thing—after they’ve tried everything else.

    ReplyDelete
  25. cracks me up too. Another good Churchill quote: The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent vice of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries. Where is leadership when we need it?

    ReplyDelete
  26. My favorite Churchill quote:

    I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I will be sober and you will still be ugly.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Poor Winston wouldn't be able to afford to drink today with all the taxes and fees on booze.

    ReplyDelete
  28. In this session, I hope to God, they once and for all get rid of the legislative scholarships. Nothing but politician giveaways to family and friends. We saw member of both the Doherty and Mulroe families benefit from these scholarships.

    ReplyDelete
  29. The legislative scholarship bill died - not even voted on or vetoed. Damn.

    The 14 million dollars spent on those scholarships comes out of students tuition. The state doesn't actually pay for the scholarships, the universities absorb the cost of the scholarships and then passes it along to all students. Wonderful.

    The shame of these scholarships is they go to people who politicians owe political favors to.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Had a nightmare last night...

    Sitting in the dark with no TV (Com Ed Rate hike), drinking a ration of metered water (water bill doubled & metered) no more beer (county booze tax), no book to read (library hours cut), can't walk the dog (can't afford his license), can't drive anywhere (three speeding tickets via the red light cameras- can't afford to pay), had to walk to the police station, 5 miles away to report my garage break-in, bike stolen, first cop I've seen in three years is in the station all my himself, throws me a report form and tells me to fill it out myself. Got mugged and hit over the head on the way home and the 911 dispatcher answers on the 23rd ring and tells me a paramedic should arrive in the next 24 hours, lie still, and call back if I start losing consciousness.

    ReplyDelete
  31. If we wanted someone to protect rich people, we'd have voted for Doherty.

    Don't screw up the Merc vote Sen. Mulroe.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Wow. 8:54 guzzles the Koch brothers Kool Aid by the barrel. So your client inherited has daddys' business and declares himself a member of the luck sperm club. Under Koch dogma that means he believes he is entitled to forever low taxation, leaving society to fend for itself.

    I'm proud of Mulroe for voting for that tax increase. That tax increase put cash in the States' pension fund. I'll bet your client, nor his client, won't pay provide a pension for their thousands of workers when they relocate to the right-to-work-for-less southern state they chose. You don't like it here? Leave!

    ReplyDelete