The state is currently about six months behind paying mental health providers who bill medicaid. The mental health safety net is bursting at the seams and has massive holes in it now. Add the stress of closing the City's Mental Health Centers and we will PAY DOUBLE the cost to keep them open with increased ER visits, jail costs, cost to CPD, etc..
This whole plan is one BIG MISTAKE.
Ripple Effects of Center Closings Will Continue for Many Years
The cavalry may be on the way. But until it arrives, some of Chicago’s most at-risk citizens — many of whom were once productive members of the community — will be in greater jeopardy from what experts describe as a frequent nonsystem of care.
Expect more of those who are uninsured to be turned away from community centers, more desperate souls seeking shelter with their families, more children whose conditions go undiagnosed, more patients than John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital can deal with, more disturbed offenders shuttled off to Cook County Jail and more homeless people.
As budget cuts continue, the ripple effects will hit many: people with chronic mental illnesses whom we may avoid on the streets; and hidden cases, like the suburban mother whose depression is so strong she can’t work or care for her children.
The cavalry is President Obama’s health care reform law, which takes effect in 2014. It’s seen by advocates as a way to ensure equal access to quality mental health services. But its worthy aims can only be achieved if it survives court challenges and if state legislatures don’t undermine it when devising related regulations, according to nonpartisan experts like Harold Pollack at the University of Chicago’s School of Social Services Administration.
The help would come in the form of insurance for those often uninsured and incentives for providers who now often spurn the uninsured. But while the law’s full impact can’t be predicted, the Chicago area’s mental health landscape will deteriorate in the interim.
Should we expect continuing declines in government support and a worsening mess?
“Yes. Historically that’s been the pattern,” said Sara Feigenholtz, a state representative from Chicago who chairs the human services appropriations committee in the Illinois House.
The budget cuts affecting a traditionally weak mental health system show no sign of abating. Mental health will remain low on the priority lists of most legislators, and among the first items to be slashed.
Mental health gets about 6 percent of health care spending, according to The American Journal of Psychiatry. But the journal estimates staggering indirect costs of perhaps $200 billion a year nationally when one includes the impact of incarceration, homelessness, a high rate of medical complications, dependence on emergency room care, lower educational attainment, a reduced ability to hold jobs and the burden on families.
But the mentally ill don’t have an army of lobbyists and clout-heavy executives making hefty campaign contributions.
“In Illinois, mental health services have never been a serious political priority, as evidenced by the recent city and county cuts,” said Dr. Ronald Davidson, director of the mental health program at the University of Illinois at Chicago’s department of psychiatry. “And reform is at risk of being whittled away by 50 state legislatures, and that means a powerful insurance lobby in Springfield gets one more shot at limiting access to mental health services.”
When Illinois cut mental heath financing for the uninsured several years ago, hundreds of mentally ill people were told they could no longer get help at the five Community Counseling Centers of Chicago, said Dr. Anthony Kopera, president and chief executive officer.
Dr. Kopera runs those centers, employing 260 people with a $17 million budget. But he said the state is six months late with $3 million in payments to him for treating mentally ill patients.
“Now the unfunded don’t ask us for help,” he said. “They suffer until they go to the hospital emergency department, or their symptoms flare up and they get picked up by the police and taken to state hospitals.”
Mr. Pollack concedes there is immediate stress on a system whose configuration is based on old assumptions as to where the needy live. The suburbanization of poverty, as many exit Chicago, means the migration to Harvey, Calumet City, Hazel Crest and elsewhere aggravates the problem because our network of facilities is based on where they lived long ago.
And even if the street peddler confronting you is getting help from a city center that’s closing, said Mr. Pollack, he probably won’t have the wherewithal to switch to one that remains open.
His last-ditch options? Bridget Gainer, a Cook County commissioner, foresees unrealistic demands placed on the jail and Stroger Hospital, and quotes the poet Robert Frost.
“Home is the place where, when you have to go there, they have to take you in.”
Expect more of those who are uninsured to be turned away from community centers, more desperate souls seeking shelter with their families, more children whose conditions go undiagnosed, more patients than John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital can deal with, more disturbed offenders shuttled off to Cook County Jail and more homeless people.
As budget cuts continue, the ripple effects will hit many: people with chronic mental illnesses whom we may avoid on the streets; and hidden cases, like the suburban mother whose depression is so strong she can’t work or care for her children.
The cavalry is President Obama’s health care reform law, which takes effect in 2014. It’s seen by advocates as a way to ensure equal access to quality mental health services. But its worthy aims can only be achieved if it survives court challenges and if state legislatures don’t undermine it when devising related regulations, according to nonpartisan experts like Harold Pollack at the University of Chicago’s School of Social Services Administration.
The help would come in the form of insurance for those often uninsured and incentives for providers who now often spurn the uninsured. But while the law’s full impact can’t be predicted, the Chicago area’s mental health landscape will deteriorate in the interim.
Should we expect continuing declines in government support and a worsening mess?
“Yes. Historically that’s been the pattern,” said Sara Feigenholtz, a state representative from Chicago who chairs the human services appropriations committee in the Illinois House.
The budget cuts affecting a traditionally weak mental health system show no sign of abating. Mental health will remain low on the priority lists of most legislators, and among the first items to be slashed.
Mental health gets about 6 percent of health care spending, according to The American Journal of Psychiatry. But the journal estimates staggering indirect costs of perhaps $200 billion a year nationally when one includes the impact of incarceration, homelessness, a high rate of medical complications, dependence on emergency room care, lower educational attainment, a reduced ability to hold jobs and the burden on families.
But the mentally ill don’t have an army of lobbyists and clout-heavy executives making hefty campaign contributions.
“In Illinois, mental health services have never been a serious political priority, as evidenced by the recent city and county cuts,” said Dr. Ronald Davidson, director of the mental health program at the University of Illinois at Chicago’s department of psychiatry. “And reform is at risk of being whittled away by 50 state legislatures, and that means a powerful insurance lobby in Springfield gets one more shot at limiting access to mental health services.”
When Illinois cut mental heath financing for the uninsured several years ago, hundreds of mentally ill people were told they could no longer get help at the five Community Counseling Centers of Chicago, said Dr. Anthony Kopera, president and chief executive officer.
Dr. Kopera runs those centers, employing 260 people with a $17 million budget. But he said the state is six months late with $3 million in payments to him for treating mentally ill patients.
“Now the unfunded don’t ask us for help,” he said. “They suffer until they go to the hospital emergency department, or their symptoms flare up and they get picked up by the police and taken to state hospitals.”
Mr. Pollack concedes there is immediate stress on a system whose configuration is based on old assumptions as to where the needy live. The suburbanization of poverty, as many exit Chicago, means the migration to Harvey, Calumet City, Hazel Crest and elsewhere aggravates the problem because our network of facilities is based on where they lived long ago.
And even if the street peddler confronting you is getting help from a city center that’s closing, said Mr. Pollack, he probably won’t have the wherewithal to switch to one that remains open.
His last-ditch options? Bridget Gainer, a Cook County commissioner, foresees unrealistic demands placed on the jail and Stroger Hospital, and quotes the poet Robert Frost.
“Home is the place where, when you have to go there, they have to take you in.”
More of Rahm's no thought slash and burn government. No consideration at all to the well being of some of the most vulnerable people in the city.
ReplyDeleteWhy does everything have to happen so quick and surgical? No thought to the consequences at all, and I agree, it will be the taxpayers who end up paying for this clusterf***.
The mayor doesn't give a rats ass about mentally ill people or young protesters. Why do you think he is hosting G8 summit? He wants to be able to legally kill as many young people protesters possible. Same with the mentally ill. The mayor hopes they go without treatment and die. More dead protesters and mentally ill mean a leaner budget.
ReplyDeleteGeez, what next? I'm beginning to think the mayor needs mental health services. The guy thrives on chaos that disrupts everyone's lives.
ReplyDeleteYeah, this was plain stupid. And the aldermen did nothing, which is worse.
ReplyDeleteLeaving the mental health centers as is would cost 4 million. Rahm raises that in 10 minutes for projects he wants to promote.
ReplyDeleteI believe he is targeting the mentally ill and anyone else who gets in his way.
Our Cook COunty taxes will just go up. The whole thing is stupid and short sighted. No one wins - not the people who need help, the taxpayers, not anyone.
ReplyDeleteEmanual is a herd thinner in the Ayn Rand/Paul Ryan mode. I found it interesting how he was recieved several weeks ago at the annual Misracordia fundraiser. The Sister who runs Misracordia gently scolded Emanual for his change in the citys' water billing policy. While good arguments can be made pro or con on whether the city should bill charities for water usage, the fact that he was otherwise warmly recieved despite his draconian, even sadistic, cuts in mental health programs shows the level of fear otherwise courageous people have of this mayor.
ReplyDeleteLet's not forget how our mayor recently found over 6 million TIF dollars for a company that specializes in selling crappy, pre-packaged meat to move from the suburbs to downtown. That's a cool 6 million tax-payer dollars for a small handfull of office jobs - and the middle finger for the mentally ill.
ReplyDeleteAnd our newspaper/tv press swooned in awe. Is it true 2 of Rahms' pals now own the Sun-Times?
This is the first I've heard obout this. What an insane move by the mayor. Where the hell are the aldermen? Treating mental illness will prevent incidents like police officers and others from being hurt and put in the position to possibly hurt someone having delusions and who is not themselves. Doesn't anyone over in city hall have any sense? Spending money on mental health prevents public health problems like unnecessary violence.
ReplyDeleteIf federal dollars will be available in 2014, why close the clinics now? Plan now for the closing in 2014. Why not create a transition plan to bridge the city mental health centers from 2012 to 2014? I'm beginning to think the city doesn't plan anything, but flies by the seat of its pants until the citizens rise up. The aldermen surely don't care and the mayor makes decisions, based on dollars and not by what is best for the people who live here and pay taxes.
ReplyDeleteThe next city council meeting is January 18. Something better be done about this at that meeting!
ReplyDeleteHere's a prediction on what the city council will do on January 18th - By a 50-0 vote the council will declare Rahm 'Supreme Leader.' They then will honor Rahm with a commemorative plaque for his behind the scenes arm twisting for tax breaks on behalf of the financial terrorists at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange.
ReplyDeleteclosing six clinics and sending everyone to the remaining clinics without hiring more staff? Sounds like a recipe for disaster
ReplyDeleteI would think the mayor and all the alderman would be really keen on keeping the mental health clinics open...after all they're all crazy
ReplyDeleteDo you people know what the word broke means? Who pays the taxes in Chicago? The country is broke due to the freeloaders.I agree with the leaving mental patients to fend for themselves is wrong. This began to happen years ago.As a once long time democrate..I no longer can be in the company of this party.It stands for the party of Socialism. Way to many people in this country is dependent on the government for a free ride.This country is doomed as most city's are. I thing Rahm is doing what he has to or it's Detroit all the way.
ReplyDeleteFirst,8:27, you were never a "democrate." The country is broke because rich people refuse to pay taxes, and people like you are fearful of them. I'd much rather have someone in Detroit as my neighbor than someone like yourself.
ReplyDelete@8:27am - the closure of the mental health clinics isn't a political issue. Both dems and reps are victims of mental illness and we as a society have a moral and ethical responsibility to protect the members of our society who are most vulnerable. In the 1990's there were 20 City of Chicago Mental Health Clinics. That number grew to 20 based on need. The numbers of persons with mental health issues have grown over the last decade and the safety net, the public safety net designed to assist, care and treat the mentally ill has been allowed to systematically be eroded and erased. From 20 clincs to 6 clincs in a little over a decade and the grand design is to eliminate them altogether.
ReplyDeleteWorse yet, there are no alternative plans in place. The city clincs provid psychiatric medications at no cost. The not for profit clinics DO NOT provide meds. Medications are what keep people from having hallucinations, delusions and debiltating signs & symptoms of depression, etc.
The City of Chicago's commissioner of health states medicaid patients can go to other not for profit clinics in the community FULLY knowing most of those clinics haven't been paid by the State of Illinois (medicaid bills) for over SIX MONTHS, some places almost a YEAR. How do not for profit clinics take on more patients when they aren't being paid for the patients they currently have?
By cutting the City of Chicago Mental Health Clinics in half without any discernable transition plan leaves patients, the community and other safety net systems at great risk. This is patient abandonment and very poor urban planning.
Lastly, in the year 2014, the health care reform bill ensures that monies will be sent to communities to address mental health. Why is the city rushing to close clinics now, when money will be available in about two years? The mayor and aldermen are placing a great many people at very high risk over 3 million dollars/year???? This makes no sense, and is simply unsafe for everyone involved.
Take a few minutes and email, call or post a FB message on your alderman's site and the Mayor's too.