Thursday, May 31, 2012

Let's Hear What the 41st Ward Has to Say About the Upcoming Fire Fighter's Contract

The Firefighters Union has started their contract negotiations, and they are in the fight of their lives to keep what they have earned.  The 41st Ward is home to many city firefighters and paramedics - they are our friends and neighbors.  Furthermore, we need to see our tax dollars reinvested in quality services in which the Chicago Firefighters Union members provide.  Investing in our Firefighter neighbors is a direct investment in our own community. If the city cuts their pay by 10%, will they be able to pay the ridiculous taxes we are forced to pay here? No.  And again, the cuts the mayor proposes will cut service delivery quality - less firefighters and paramedics means longer wait times, etc.... 
Call City Hall, call the Alderman's Office and tell them you support the firefighters and paramedics.


Rahm Emanuel: Firefighters not ‘immune from . . . change and reform’
storyidforme: 31317568
tmspicid: 10982858
fileheaderid: 4946348       

Updated: May 31, 2012 2:18AM

Chicago firefighters “do a great job,” but they’re not “immune from the change and reform” needed to solve the city’s financial crisis and deliver “greater value” to taxpayers, Mayor Rahm Emanuel said Wednesday.

Tom Ryan, president of Chicago Firefighters Union Local 2, has characterized the cost-cutting contract concessions the mayor is seeking from firefighters when their contract expires June 30 as “horrendous,” “insulting” and “ridiculous.”

Emanuel refused to respond in kind, nor would he discuss specifics of his proposal to target perks that, one union leader claimed, add $7,000 to the average firefighter’s annual paycheck.
He simply said that “change” and “reform” are required everywhere and that no interest group gets a pass.
“Our firefighters do a great job serving the city . . . They do hard work. We will make sure that they’re properly — not only compensated, but respected for the work that they do . . . [But] no part of the budget is immune from change and reform to get greater value for the taxpayers as well as greater service for the citizens of Chicago. . . . We’re not shying away from difficult decisions,” Emanuel said.

“You describe [the proposals] as cuts. [But] there are places that, while negotiations are private, that I would say are reforms.”
The mayor said he understands why Ryan has taken a hard line to protect the interests of his members.
But, he said, “I’ve got to make sure that the taxpayers and the residents are represented. That’s my role. . . . I respect what Tom has to do . . . But I’ve got to make sure that we’re making the changes that are necessary for the future and we’re not just doing things that we used to do because we used to do ’em . . . We’re not gonna do it just because we did it in the past.”

The Chicago Sun-Times reported Wednesday that Emanuel is seeking a laundry list of cost-cutting concessions from Chicago firefighters that take aim at such treasured union perks as holiday and duty availability pay; clothing allowance; pay grades; premium pay; the physical fitness incentive and the seven percent premium paid to cross-trained firefighter-paramedics.

Ald. Nick Sposato (36th), a former Chicago firefighter, sided with his union brethren.
“It looks almost like you’re looking at a 10 percent pay cut to me. That’s pretty drastic I think,” said Sposato, one of the big losers in the ward remap.

“The city starts here. The union starts there and, somewhere, they’ll come together and resolve all of this, I would hope, and cooler heads will prevail.”
The mayor’s plan does not include closing fire stations. But it would alter the minimum manning requirement that triggered the bitter 1980 firefighters strike.

The current contract requires that every piece of fire apparatus be staffed by at least five employees. Emanuel’s plan calls for all “double houses” that include both engines and trucks to be staffed by nine firefighters instead of 10.

Rookie probation would double—from nine months to 18 months.
And just eight months after denying plans to upgrade ambulance service in Chicago, Emanuel wants to covert the city’s 15 basic-life-support ambulances to advanced life support.
The plan would cost roughly $50,000 for every one of the 15 BLS ambulances. It would leave the city with 75 ambulances capable of providing the most sophisticated level of care.

Chicago currently has 60 ALS ambulances, each staffed by two paramedics qualified to administer intravenous medication. ALS ambulances are stocked with drugs and equipped with heart monitoring devices.
The 15 BLS ambulances are staffed by emergency medical technicians who undergo less training. BLS ambulances do not have medicine or monitoring equipment. They are only permitted to transport patients to hospitals.

Inspector General Joe Ferguson has estimated that Chicago taxpayers could save $57 million-a-year by reducing — from five employees to four — the minimum number of employees required to staff every piece of fire apparatus.
Ferguson has further estimated that the city could save $52 million-a-year by eliminating the duty availability pay that compensates both police officers and firefighters for being on 24-hour call. For firefighters, the perk costs the city nearly $14.3 million a year.

The inspector general pegged the annual uniform allowance at anywhere from $1,250 to $1,500 per firefighter, depending on the shift.
Chicago firefighters have been waiting for Emanuel to drop the other shoe ever since last fall.
That’s when the mayor made it clear he planned to take a hard line in contract talks — even though his own hero fire commissioner Robert Hoff was “deathly against” closing fire houses or reducing the minimum staffing requirement on fire apparatus.

Four months later, Hoff abruptly resigned, leaving firefighters without a champion.
The scary thing for firefighters is that the mayor’s proposed contract concessions come on top of his plan to solve the city’s pension crisis, which would take even more money out of firefighters’ paychecks.
Emanuel’s pension plan calls for a five percent increase in employee pension contributions; a 10-year freeze in cost-of-living increases for retirees; a five-year increase in the retirement age and a two-tiered pension system for new and old employees.


28 comments:

  1. If Alderman O'Connor stays quiet about this like she has eeverything else, we need to seriously have a cop or firefighter run against her. She is in way over her head and just rubber stamps anything that Rahm wants.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Rahm could finance pension shortages of all city workers with a financial transaction tax on those crooks wheeling and dealing at the Mercantile Exchange. All Rahm has to do is pick up the phone and call Senator Cullerton to start the process in Springfield, just as he did when wanted approval for the July debut of speed cameras. Of course it will never happen. Rahm will protect them and screw us.

    This town is swimming in money. Rich peoples money. Money they hide in the Caymens. Money they inherit from their daddy. Money stolen by punk banksters. Tax the bastards.

    ReplyDelete
  3. A Firefighter friend told me some Firemen turned their back on Rahm when he showed up at Fire houses during the campaign. It shows how their training and instincts kick in when confronting dangererous situations.

    Now Rahm will avenge being snubbed. Punk.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It shows how their training and instincts kick in when confronting dangererous situations.

      I would think they should stay as far away as possible from something TOXIC.

      Delete
  4. I agree with Rahm on this one - Chicago firefighters “do a great job,” but they’re not “immune from the change and reform” needed to solve the city’s financial crisis and deliver “greater value” to taxpayers

    CFD has traditionally been untouchable. Time to shake things up a bit and pull some cost out of that dept.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rahm needs to lead by example. Let's start with cutting the 50 public relations people, 50 policy analysts, 30 administrative assistants and his personal valet (who makes $74,000/year). After Rahm trims his staff to the bare bone, then maybe we can take him seriously when he threatens to cut some of the few city services left. Rahm, himself isn't "immune from change and reform" and we don't need PR staffers whose job is to make Rahm look good. Rahm, cut your fluff staff, who make thousands more than Daley's staffers used to.

      Delete
    2. To 2:45; If the best you can do is to quote Rahm's focus group - tested talking points in support of his position, then clapping like a seal for Rahm can't be far off. Jeez...

      Delete
  5. We have no cops and Rahmbo refuses to hire more, and now he want the fire dept trimmed to dangerous levels too. Who do you think will be most impacted? It will be the 41st Ward - the first place every department pulls from when the rest of the city is up for grabs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There are plenty of cops, just not in the wards where people behave themselves and actually want the police.

      Delete
  6. CFFs and CPD and CTU need to come together and fight the mayor.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Service cuts will start with the 41st Ward, they always do. If you support cuts for the CFFs be ready to wait when you have a heart attack or your house is on fire. Get those garden hoses ready, and start taking aspirin to prevent the "grabber".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's amazing how I see all of the good work being done and then nothing more than gripes? What gives? 10 years of negligence by the former Alderman caused these issues.

      Delete
  8. How is voting Democrat working out for you? Keep voting it sheep.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. http://macromon.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/nfp_series1.jpg

      I'd say it's working just fine. Just like anything in life, fine tuning is in order!

      Delete
  9. I don't think Alderman O'Connor will drop the ball on this one. After all, who's the husband of her chief of staff??????

    ReplyDelete
  10. FYI: The aldermen have little to do with the actual negotiation. The mayor and his staff negotiate with the CFF Union directly. At the end, the aldermen vote to ratify or pass the contract, but that is usually a rubber stamp. The aldermen usually aren't involved in negotiations unless there is a serious issue with the contract.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Get rid of the "me too" clause in CFF contract. No way do firemen deserve the same as the Police. Firemen have plenty of time to hold a full time second job--often times pretending to be tradesmen and working non-union while taking the job of a legitimate union tradesman. I'm tired of the wining firemen expecting every one to back them when they turn around and take jobs from union tradesmen. They sleep all night at the fire house and then go to "work" for less money because they don't have to worry about benefits. Also the equipment and building structures and codes have advanced to the point that we don't need the same number of firemen. Go by the Avondale fire house and tell me they can't afford to reduce man power. Cut man power and cut salaries. This is one time I will be happy we have a wimpy do nothing alderman. Rham will give her cover on this one but make no mistake she is Rham's little puppet.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 11:35am - your comments are nothing but an inaccurate generalization. Sure there are a few firemen who do side work that probably takes jobs away from union workers, but on the whole the scenerio you portray is flawed. Most firefighters do not work full time in addition to their fire fighter jobs. Many watch children so their wives can work. Some volunteer at their kids' schools because they have time off during the day. Some are taking aging parents to the doctor. What workers do with their time off is their business. Lots of chicago police officers moonlight, too. Lets not get off the track here. For the work they do, Chicago fire fighters should not be downgraded and wages should not be cut. Let them keep what they have, give them a cost of living raise and cut fluff positions by attrition.

      Delete
    2. In all honesty, and I'm not the OP, but I have a hard time accepting hoping for a raise for people, when the private sector employees have been getting slammed for a lot longer. I don't blame the unions wanting to keep what they have, but have little sympathy for them if they have give some. Many private sector employees don't get this option, they just lose their jobs. This arrogance, that even in a bad economy, the unions still want, want, want, isn't going to garner any sympathy.

      Delete
  12. This post is about the firefighters contract. Many of the comments coming in have nothing to do with the post. So, what does everyone think about this contract, and upcoming CPD & CTU contracts, too?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are correct about comments having nothing to do with your post. The best example of that is 8:52. Obviously a republicon with nothing to offer but tax cuts for his boss, and hatred for everyone else. As for the notion of no money for anything, and austerity for all but 8:52's boss, it's a whopper republicon lie. Tax the transactions of the coke-snorters at the CME. You know, the one's 8:52 bows to.

      Delete
    2. I feel the love from you 12:53 pm

      Delete
  13. Thank you and I appreciate getting down to the facts. The contract is going to be tough. Like I said, there will need to be some belt tightening by everyone. There is just no money to do what the unions want at this time.

    ReplyDelete
  14. The firemens union doesn't have the public support the police and the teachers do. The upcoming contract will be a battle and they are going to be unhappy, no doubt about it. If all the city workers unions would come together and present a united front, they would have more power.

    ReplyDelete
  15. We wouldn't have to pay the ridiculous taxes if we didn't have to pay the ridiculous benefit packages for public employees--especially the part time firemen. Cut them all!

    ReplyDelete
  16. Where was the support when thousands of us non-union employees had to take up to 10% salary cuts over the past 6-8 years? No where. As stated above, "If the city cuts their (firemen) pay by 10%, will they be able to pay the ridiculous taxes we are forced to pay here? No." Well, we had no choice in the matter. Now because the almighty fire dept is complaining, everyone is coming to the rescue.

    When Emanual took office, he removed this forced paycut and we are now getting what we are supposed to make. Nothing more than that, which I'm thrilled to get.

    Believe me, I feel the pain for anyone who gets their pay cut as my family lived it and it's not too fun. I also don't want to see our services cut either. There just has to be a better way instead of effecting families and their income.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Maybe the Chicago Firefights Union shouldn't have given a substantial amount of money to a failed 41st ward campaign for a fireman.

    Now they are asking for money. Stop wasting our money.

    ReplyDelete